There was an interesting article published by Slate late last week about a topic that I discuss in one of my first posts - the undeniably important role of micronutrients, particularly in developing countries, on global health. While there are many prominent issues that have a resounding impact on population health in many poor countries of the world, treatment deficiencies in micronutrients stands out due to it's relative economic feasibility.
The topic is in the spotlight once again as the meeting which shone the spotlight on micronutrients four years ago, the Copenhagen Conference, is set to take place again, and once again, an expert panel of world renowned economics will ho and hum as to which "solution" to global health is the most economically worthwhile - that is, which issue has the greatest payoff for the amount of money invested.
Not a bad idea to be sure, but I am wary about how much bang per buck we can achieve using this strategy. The beauty about focusing on vitamin A and zinc was that strategies hoping to decrease deficiencies in these nutrients were relatively cheap to implement, and that they resulted in significant results in terms of decreased morbidity, if not mortality. The reason I worry about the strategy of increasing yield is that they do not specify which types of crops will be affected by the solutions. For instance, an increase in rice yields will certainly do a lot of good in areas of the world that are affected by famine. But, if you're not, then rice is itself does not contain many significant nutrients. When people don't get sufficient vitamin A, there are health consequences that follow. Unless you're in a famine, there is no disease that results from a lack of rice.
In any case, I look forward to the full paper by Hoddinott et al on malnutrition etc., as well as the other cases of the Consensus. On a slight tangent, it would be particularly interesting if the Consensus decided to once again choose a malnutrition issue as its top solution. I suspect it is more likely that the institution will choose an issue in a different field, to diversify the attentions of the global health activists, and from a political standpoint, to avoid implying that not enough has been done in the area in the past four years.
1xbet korean - No persons under the age of 18 years or older
ReplyDeleteLicensed Sports Betting & Lottery. 1xbet is a casino and poker site. 1xbet is licensed and regulated by 1xbet es the Malta Gaming Authority and the International
Casino, Slots, Poker, & More - Mapyro
ReplyDeleteExplore 상주 출장안마 Mapyro's casino, 전주 출장샵 slots, poker, & 남원 출장마사지 more 여수 출장안마 places to play, stay, play, and get directions, reviews and information for casinos in PA. 구리 출장안마